In double bind theory, what does the primary negative injunction signify?

In double bind theory, the primary negative injunction signifies a command that prohibits or undermines a specific action. This concept is rooted in the idea that an individual receives conflicting messages that create a dilemma, particularly in the context of communication within relationships. The primary negative injunction serves as the foundational conflict, where a person might be instructed not to do something, which leads to confusion and anxiety when they are simultaneously faced with expectations or demands to act in a particular way.

For example, a child may be told by a parent not to express any feelings of frustration but then may be chastised for appearing distant or emotionally unresponsive. This generates a binding experience where the individual is caught between the command not to show emotions and the need to connect with others emotionally, creating a significant psychological conflict.

The other options do not align with the core definition of the primary negative injunction as they either imply a positive command or suggest autonomy that does not align with the essence of double bind situations, which are inherently about conflicting directives that restrict or inhibit behavior.